By BBR Research Team / Market Research

Park Hyatt occupies a specific position in the branded residence market that is easy to misread. It is not the largest luxury residential brand, Four Seasons and Ritz-Carlton both have deeper portfolios. It is not the most exclusive, Aman and Mandarin Oriental operate at tighter scales. What Park Hyatt offers is something more particular: a residentially-inspired luxury identity that translates naturally into actual residences, backed by Hyatt’s increasingly aggressive multi-brand residential strategy.

For buyers comparing brand options across luxury markets, the question is not whether Park Hyatt is a good brand. It is whether a specific Park Hyatt residence, in a specific location, from a specific developer, justifies its premium over comparable branded and non-branded alternatives. That distinction is where this analysis begins.

Park Hyatt Residential Market Snapshot

50+

Hyatt residential projects

Open or pipeline

18

Operating projects

Across Hyatt brands

30+

Pipeline projects

Residential growth

30-35%

Typical branded premium

Global average range

Article navigation

Brand hierarchy
Portfolio overview
Investment considerations
Buyer-fit framework
Due diligence
Risks and tradeoffs

Park Hyatt sits closest to Mandarin Oriental and Four Seasons in tier positioning: refined, culturally specific, and deliberately small-scale. It carries less brand power than Aman in the ultra-prime scarcity segment, less global consistency than Four Seasons across all markets, and a smaller resale footprint than Ritz-Carlton. That smaller footprint is both the brand’s strength and its constraint.

Brand	Positioning	Key Strength	Key Tradeoff
Park Hyatt	Refined upper-luxury Hyatt tier	Cultural specificity, design restraint, and smaller-scale luxury	Smaller resale footprint and thinner regional coverage
Four Seasons	Ultra-luxury operator	Global service depth and premium defensibility	Higher pricing and more corporate feel in some markets
Ritz-Carlton	Luxury hotel-branded benchmark	Deep residential recognition and resale audience	Can feel broader and less boutique than Park Hyatt
Mandarin Oriental	Asian-rooted ultra-luxury hospitality	Service reputation and refined brand image	Smaller global footprint than Ritz-Carlton or Four Seasons
Aman	Ultra-prime scarcity brand	Exceptional privacy, scarcity, and UHNW appeal	Highest pricing and narrowest buyer pool

Park Hyatt Within Hyatt’s Luxury Hierarchy

Source: Hyatt brand hierarchy framework

Park Hyatt sits at the pinnacle of Hyatt’s brand portfolio. In January 2025, Hyatt reorganized its brands into five collections, Luxury, Lifestyle, Inclusive, Classics, and Essentials, with Park Hyatt anchoring the Luxury tier alongside Alila and Miraval ⁽¹⁾. Founded in 1980 with Park Hyatt Chicago, the brand has grown its luxury portfolio by 146% since 2017 ⁽²⁾.

This matters for residence buyers because Park Hyatt is not the only Hyatt brand entering the residential market. Thompson Hotels, Andaz, The Standard, and Miraval all have active residential programs at different price points and lifestyle positions ⁽³⁾. A buyer researching “Hyatt branded residences” may encounter projects ranging from Thompson’s lifestyle-oriented developments in Mexico to Miraval’s wellness villas in Saudi Arabia. These are fundamentally different products.

The distinction buyers should draw: Park Hyatt residences carry the brand’s flagship luxury positioning, smaller scale, residentially-inspired design, and culturally specific interiors. Other Hyatt-brand residences (Thompson, Andaz, The Standard) target different buyer profiles: younger demographics, design-forward aesthetics, or social-lifestyle orientation. Conflating them under a single “Hyatt residences” umbrella misrepresents the product.

To underscore the commitment, Hyatt appointed Tina Necrason as its first Global Head of Branded Residential, a role created specifically to scale residential across all Hyatt brands ⁽⁴⁾. Her appointment signals institutional intent, not a brand extension experiment.

The Park Hyatt Branded Residence Portfolio

Park Hyatt’s residential portfolio is smaller than Four Seasons’ or Ritz-Carlton’s, but it spans a range of markets, from supertall urban towers to resort villas. Across all Hyatt brands, the company reports more than 50 branded residential projects either open or in development, with 18 currently operating and over 30 in the pipeline ⁽⁴⁾. Park Hyatt specifically anchors the luxury end of that figure.

Below is an editorial overview of the major Park Hyatt branded residence projects. This is a curated summary based on available data, not a replacement for BBR’s live brand and city rankings, which reflect current market positioning and are updated independently.

Completed and Operating

Park Hyatt New York (One57), New York City, USA

Park Hyatt New York (One57), New York City, USA

One57 remains the most high-profile Park Hyatt residential project globally. Developed by Extell Development Company and designed by Christian de Portzamparc, the 75-storey supertall at 157 West 57th Street includes 92 condominiums above a 210-room Park Hyatt hotel ⁽⁵⁾. The building opened in 2014 and became synonymous with Billionaires’ Row, including a widely reported $100.5 million penthouse sale to Michael Dell ⁽⁶⁾.

Strength: Iconic CBD location on Billionaires’ Row with direct Park Hyatt hotel services. Among the earliest and most recognizable luxury branded residence projects in the Western hemisphere.

Tradeoff: Pricing peaked at approximately $5,629 per square foot in 2015 and declined to around $3,900 per square foot by 2020 ⁽⁵⁾. One57 illustrates a recurring risk in branded residences: initial pricing premiums can compress in softening markets. Buyers who purchased near the peak experienced meaningful paper losses, regardless of the brand attached.

Best suited to: Buyers prioritizing Manhattan trophy address and hotel-serviced living, with a long holding horizon and tolerance for cyclical pricing volatility.

Park Hyatt Niseko Hanazono, Hokkaido, Japan

Park Hyatt Niseko Hanazono, Hokkaido, Japan

Developed by Pacific Century Premium Developments (PCPD), this was the first Park Hyatt residential project in Japan. The development includes 113 residences with ski-in/ski-out access and private onsen facilities across a site of approximately 789,000 square metres ⁽⁷⁾.

Strength: Niseko’s established international ski market, strong rental demand from seasonal visitors, and one of the few branded resort residence options in Japan’s luxury ski segment.

Tradeoff: Seasonal demand concentration. Niseko’s peak season is relatively narrow compared to year-round resort destinations. Off-season rental income is significantly lower, and buyers should underwrite returns conservatively.

Best suited to: Resort-lifestyle buyers with personal use in mind, or investors comfortable with seasonal rental yield patterns.

Park Hyatt Beaver Creek, Colorado, USA

A completed, sold-out fractional-ownership residence within the Park Hyatt Beaver Creek resort. The project converted 55 hotel rooms into 15 fractional residences sold as 1/20 shares during a $30 million renovation ⁽⁸⁾.

Strength: Ski-in/ski-out access with full Park Hyatt resort amenities at a lower entry point via fractional ownership.

Tradeoff: Fractional ownership limits control, customization, and resale liquidity. It is a usage product, not a capital-growth investment.

Best suited to: Lifestyle buyers seeking branded ski-resort access without full ownership costs.

Recently Opened and Launching

Park Hyatt London River Thames, Nine Elms, London, UK

Park Hyatt London River Thames, Nine Elms, London, UK

Park Hyatt’s first UK residential project. Located in a 42-storey KPF-designed tower at One Nine Elms, the development includes 103 residences, ranging from one-bedroom apartments to four five-bedroom penthouses, above the 210-room Park Hyatt hotel, which opened in October 2024 ⁽⁹⁾. Residences are being marketed from GBP 1.7 million by Knightcrest ⁽¹⁰⁾.

Strength: London’s first Park Hyatt, strong brand novelty in a market dominated by Four Seasons and Mandarin Oriental. River Thames frontage and proximity to Central London.

Tradeoff: Nine Elms as a micro-location carries regeneration risk. The area has seen significant new supply from multiple developments, and price growth has lagged behind established prime London postcodes like Mayfair, Knightsbridge, and Belgravia. The developer, RandF Properties, experienced financial difficulties during construction, a reminder that brand attachment does not eliminate developer execution risk ⁽⁹⁾.

Best suited to: Buyers who believe in Nine Elms’ long-term trajectory and want Park Hyatt services at a lower entry point than established prime London branded residences. Due diligence on developer and building completion quality is essential.

Park Hyatt Los Cabos at Cabo del Sol, Mexico

Park Hyatt Los Cabos at Cabo del Sol, Mexico

A resort-oriented residential project by SOMA (Sordo Madaleno Arquitectos) alongside a 163-room Park Hyatt hotel. The residential component includes 11 villas and 8 apartments, just 19 units total ⁽¹¹⁾. Individual villas have been listed above $12 million ⁽¹²⁾.

Strength: Extremely low unit count creates genuine scarcity. Two championship golf courses, a 20,000 square foot spa, and five dining venues create resort infrastructure depth. This is Park Hyatt’s first Mexico-branded residence.

Tradeoff: High entry price with limited comparable resale data. Los Cabos is a seasonal market with concentration risk among North American buyers. Liquidity for $12 million-plus resort villas is inherently thin.

Best suited to: Ultra-high-net-worth buyers seeking a personal-use resort villa with brand servicing, not yield-driven investors.

Under Construction

Park Hyatt Mexico City, Polanco

Also developed by SOMA, this project includes 23 branded residences above a 155-room Park Hyatt hotel on Campos Eliseos Street in Polanco, overlooking Chapultepec Park ⁽¹³⁾. Expected to open in 2026.

Strength: Prime urban location in Mexico City’s most established luxury neighbourhood. Proximity to Museo Jumex, Rufino Tamayo, and the National Museum of Anthropology reinforces Park Hyatt’s cultural-immersion positioning.

Tradeoff: Mexico City’s ultra-luxury branded residence market is less established than Dubai, London, or New York. Buyers are making an early-mover bet on the city’s trajectory as a luxury residential destination. Foreign ownership regulations in Mexico require purchases through a fideicomiso (bank trust) in certain zones, adding structural complexity.

Best suited to: Buyers with existing ties to Mexico City or conviction about the market’s luxury trajectory, comfortable with lower resale liquidity than established global markets.

Park Hyatt Phu Quoc, Vietnam

Developed by BIM Group, this resort project includes 65 pool villas across 160 acres of beachfront on Phu Quoc island, adjacent to the UNESCO Kien Giang Biosphere Reserve ⁽¹⁴⁾. Unit sizes range from two-bedroom to four-bedroom villas, with expected opening in 2026.

Strength: Vietnam’s growing tourism market, significant beachfront land holdings, and one of the few internationally branded resort residences on Phu Quoc.

Tradeoff: Vietnam’s foreign ownership rules are restrictive, foreigners can typically lease for 50 years but cannot hold freehold title to land. Infrastructure on Phu Quoc, while improving, remains less developed than established Southeast Asian resort destinations like Phuket or Bali. Currency risk (VND) adds a layer for international buyers.

Best suited to: Buyers with a Southeast Asia lifestyle focus who accept leasehold structures, or those betting on Vietnam’s emerging luxury tourism arc with a long time horizon.

Pipeline and Uncertain Projects

Project	Region	Status Label	Buyer Note
Park Hyatt Cancun	Mexico / Caribbean	Pipeline / buyer watchlist	Strength: resort demand and Hyatt luxury positioning could support lifestyle use. Tradeoff: final residential structure, delivery timing, and rental model need confirmation.
Park Hyatt Vancouver	Canada	Longer-term / uncertain	Strength: Vancouver would fit Park Hyatt’s refined urban-luxury profile. Tradeoff: no clear investable residential inventory should be assumed until status and ownership structure are confirmed.
Park Hyatt Taormina	Italy / Sicily	Pipeline / uncertain residential component	Strength: Taormina has scarcity and strong leisure appeal. Tradeoff: buyer access, completion path, and residential ownership rights remain the key unknowns.

Park Hyatt Los Angeles (Oceanwide Plaza), Originally planned as a major multi-tower project with 504 condominiums and a 184-room hotel, this development stalled when developer China Oceanwide Holdings entered financial distress. A bankruptcy sale to KPC Development for approximately $470 million was under court review in early 2026 ⁽¹⁵⁾. Whether the Park Hyatt branding survives the ownership change remains unclear.

This project is a cautionary data point. Brand name does not substitute for developer solvency. Buyers who placed deposits on the strength of the Park Hyatt name faced years of construction limbo because the developer failed.

Additional Park Hyatt projects announced but with limited confirmed residential details include Cancun (Mexico), Vancouver (Canada, expected 2026), and Taormina, Sicily (expected 2027) ⁽²⁾.

How BBR Evaluates Park Hyatt Branded Residences

BBR assesses every branded residence project across consistent criteria. Here is how that framework applies specifically to Park Hyatt:

01

Brand Strength and Operator Credibility

Park Hyatt’s brand is well-established in luxury hospitality, with a 45-year track record. However, brand strength varies by market. Park Hyatt has strong awareness in Asia-Pacific and North America but less dominance in the Middle East and Europe, where Four Seasons, Mandarin Oriental, and Aman carry more weight in the ultra-luxury segment. Buyers should assess brand recognition in the specific market where they are purchasing, not brand strength globally.

02

Developer Track Record

Park Hyatt uses a licensing model: the developer builds and sells; Hyatt licenses the brand and governs service standards through a Residences Management Agreement ⁽⁴⁾. This means developer quality varies dramatically between projects. SOMA’s track record in Mexico is different from RandF Properties’ experience in London, which is different from BIM Group’s profile in Vietnam. Evaluating the developer is as important as evaluating the brand, possibly more so.

03

Service Depth and Ongoing Obligations

Park Hyatt residences typically sit above or adjacent to a Park Hyatt hotel, giving owners access to hotel services: concierge, housekeeping, dining, spa, and fitness. This service layer is a genuine differentiator. However, it comes with ongoing costs, service charges, HOA fees, and brand-mandated maintenance standards that owners cannot opt out of.

04

Location Quality

Park Hyatt’s portfolio spans urban CBD locations (New York, London, Mexico City), resort destinations (Los Cabos, Niseko, Phu Quoc), and emerging markets (Vietnam). Each carries different risk-return profiles. Urban projects offer deeper resale liquidity but lower yields. Resort projects offer lifestyle appeal and rental income potential but with seasonal concentration and thinner resale markets.

05

Pricing Context

There is no single “Park Hyatt price.” One57 in New York has seen units trade in the tens of millions of dollars. London starts at GBP 1.7 million. Los Cabos villas exceed $12 million. Pricing is project-specific, developer-dependent, and market-driven. The brand adds a premium, but the size of that premium depends on local comparables, developer execution, service depth, and scarcity.

Investment Considerations

Pricing Premiums

Branded residences globally command an average premium of roughly 30-35% over comparable non-branded properties, according to Savills’ 2025/2026 Branded Residences Report ⁽¹⁶⁾. In urban markets, premiums average around 30%; in resort locations, around 39%; and in emerging markets, premiums can reach 45-60% where trusted international brands reduce perceived buyer risk ⁽¹⁶⁾.

Park Hyatt-specific premium data is limited. Unlike Ritz-Carlton in Miami or Four Seasons in Dubai, where transaction volumes allow market-level premium analysis, Park Hyatt’s smaller unit counts make project-level generalizations unreliable. Buyers should benchmark against local comparables on a project-by-project basis rather than assuming a standard “Park Hyatt premium.”

Service Charges and Ongoing Costs

Service charges are among the most frequently underestimated costs in branded residence ownership. Industry ranges typically fall between $2 and $5 per square foot per month, or roughly 0.5% to 2% of purchase price annually ⁽¹⁷⁾. For context, some branded residences in comparable markets report monthly charges between $4,000 and $16,000 depending on unit size ⁽¹⁷⁾.

Park Hyatt residences carry brand-mandated service standards, which means service charges tend to sit at the higher end of ranges for their respective markets. Buyers should request the full fee schedule, including HOA dues, brand licensing fees, reserve fund contributions, and any rental-program costs, before committing. Annual fees that seem manageable at purchase can compound over a holding period and erode net returns.

Rental Yields: What the Data Supports and What It Does Not

BBR does not publish projected yields for specific branded residence projects because yield figures are highly sensitive to assumptions about occupancy, seasonal demand, management fees, and local regulation.

What the data does support: branded residences in high-demand markets like Dubai and Miami have generated gross yields in the range of 6-8%, compared with 4-5% for non-branded luxury properties in the same areas ⁽¹⁸⁾. Net yields, after service charges, management fees, brand licensing costs, reserve funds, and vacancy, are materially lower and project-specific.

For Park Hyatt specifically, resort projects (Niseko, Los Cabos, Phu Quoc) may offer rental income through hotel-managed rental programmes, but seasonal demand concentration and high service charges mean net yields can disappoint. Urban projects (London, Mexico City) may see steadier occupancy but lower gross rental rates relative to purchase price.

The honest framing: Branded residence yields are not guaranteed, and the premium you pay at purchase directly compresses the yield calculation. A property that commands a 35% branded premium needs to generate 35% more rental income than a comparable non-branded unit just to match its yield on cost. In many markets, it does not.

Resale and Liquidity

Park Hyatt’s brand recognition supports resale, an international buyer in Tokyo or New York understands what Park Hyatt represents, which reduces friction in cross-border transactions. However, liquidity varies enormously by market. One57 in Manhattan trades in a deep resale market. A villa in Phu Quoc does not.

One57 also illustrates that branded residence prices are not immune to market cycles. Peak-vintage buyers experienced significant price declines despite the Park Hyatt name ⁽⁵⁾. Brand attachment may cushion downside relative to non-branded peers, but it does not eliminate market risk.

Resort residences with low unit counts (Los Cabos, Niseko) face inherently thin resale markets. Buyers should plan for longer holding periods and accept that exit timing may be constrained.

Buyer-Fit Framework: Who Park Hyatt Residences Suit

Strong fit: design-led luxury buyers who value cultural specificity over global standardization, understated luxury seekers who find Four Seasons or Ritz-Carlton too corporate, and urban-resort mix buyers who want one brand across multiple property types.

Consider alternatives: ultra-exclusive UHNW buyers for whom Aman-level scarcity is the priority, brand-driven investors chasing the highest resale premiums in established markets, and buyers focused on the Middle East or Europe where Park Hyatt’s regional footprint is thinner.

Not every buyer profile fits Park Hyatt, and not every Park Hyatt project fits every buyer. BBR recommends the following framework:

Strong fit

Where Park Hyatt makes sense

Cultural design buyers

Buyers who value residentially-inspired design and cultural specificity. Park Hyatt’s brand DNA emphasises site-specific interiors and local cultural integration. Buyers who want a residence that feels distinct to its city, not a globally standardised luxury template, will find this compelling.

Hotel-serviced urban living

Buyers seeking hotel-serviced urban living in markets where Park Hyatt has strong hotel operations. The service layer is the core value proposition. If the adjacent Park Hyatt hotel is well-run, the residential experience is elevated. If the hotel underperforms, the residential product suffers.

Brand diversification

Multi-property owners looking for a brand they do not already hold. For buyers who already own Four Seasons or Ritz-Carlton branded residences, Park Hyatt offers diversification within the ultra-luxury hotel-branded segment without repeating brand exposure.

Consider alternatives

Where another brand may fit better

Scarcity and exclusivity

Maximum scarcity and exclusivity are paramount. Aman and Mandarin Oriental operate at lower density and carry higher exclusivity positioning. Park Hyatt projects are small relative to Ritz-Carlton or Marriott brands but larger than Aman’s typical 20-40 unit developments.

Resale depth

Established resale depth is critical. Four Seasons and Ritz-Carlton have deeper secondary markets in more cities. Buyers for whom exit strategy is a primary concern may find those portfolios more liquid.

Middle East or Europe focus

The target market is the Middle East or Europe. Park Hyatt’s brand presence in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, London, and Mediterranean markets is newer and thinner than Four Seasons, Mandarin Oriental, or Aman. Brand premium in these markets may be lower for Park Hyatt than for competitors with longer regional track records.

Lifestyle or wellness priority

Lifestyle or wellness positioning is the priority. Hyatt’s own portfolio offers Andaz for design-forward buyers, The Standard for cultural lifestyle, and Miraval for wellness, sometimes at lower entry points than Park Hyatt with more focused lifestyle alignment.

Due Diligence That Matters

Regardless of brand, BBR recommends buyers evaluate:

1

Developer track record

Hyatt licenses the brand; the developer delivers the building. Research the developer’s prior projects, financial stability, and delivery history. The Oceanwide Plaza situation in Los Angeles demonstrates what happens when the developer fails.

2

Service charge structure

Request the complete annual cost breakdown, not just the headline figure. Include HOA, brand licensing, reserve fund, and any mandatory rental-programme fees.

3

Ownership structure

Freehold, leasehold, fideicomiso, or fractional? Each carries different legal, tax, and exit implications. Vietnam (leasehold), Mexico (fideicomiso), and some resort markets impose structural constraints that affect long-term value.

4

Rental programme terms

If the project offers a hotel-managed rental programme, understand the revenue split, minimum stay requirements, owner blackout periods, and furnished-to-standard obligations.

5

Brand contract duration

Brand licensing agreements have fixed terms. If the agreement is not renewed, the residence may lose its branded status and associated services. Understand the term length and renewal provisions.

Risks and Tradeoffs

BBR’s independent assessment identifies the following risk factors specific to Park Hyatt branded residences:

1

Developer variability

Because Hyatt licenses rather than develops, the quality gap between the best and worst Park Hyatt residential projects is a direct function of the developer behind them. Brand does not compensate for weak execution.

2

Premium compression

One57’s pricing trajectory demonstrates that initial premiums can erode, particularly in markets with new competing supply. Buyers paying top-of-market prices for brand association should model downside scenarios.

3

Less resale data

Park Hyatt’s residential portfolio is smaller than Four Seasons’ or Ritz-Carlton’s, which means less transaction data for buyers and their advisors to benchmark against. Comparable analysis is harder.

4

Emerging-market execution

Several pipeline projects (Phu Quoc, Mexico City, Cancun) are in markets where luxury branded residences are relatively new. Infrastructure, regulatory frameworks, and buyer demand patterns in these markets carry higher uncertainty.

5

Service-charge escalation

Branded residences require maintenance to brand standards. Charges can escalate over time, particularly as buildings age and require capital expenditure on shared amenities and common areas. Buyers should model escalating costs, not static fees.

Conclusion

Park Hyatt brings a genuine luxury hospitality pedigree to the branded residence market, 45 years of hotel operations, a deliberately small-scale brand ethos, and a residential design philosophy that predates the residential product itself. That is a credible starting point.

But credible brand identity is not the same as a credible investment in every project, every market, and at every price. The strongest Park Hyatt residences pair the brand’s luxury DNA with a proven developer, a high-quality location, transparent cost structures, and defensible pricing relative to local comparables. The weakest rely on the name alone.

Park Hyatt is the right choice when the specific project combines the brand’s luxury DNA with a proven developer, strong location, and pricing that reflects local comparables rather than brand aspiration alone. It is not the right choice when the buyer needs the deepest resale liquidity, the strongest regional brand recognition, or maximum scarcity. In those cases, Four Seasons, Aman, or Mandarin Oriental may be more defensible depending on the market.

Hyatt’s decision to appoint dedicated residential leadership and expand across multiple brands signals that this is an early-growth portfolio, not a mature one. For buyers, that creates opportunity and risk in roughly equal measure. Early movers in the right projects may benefit from brand momentum. Late movers in weaker markets may find they overpaid for a logo.

Brand is only the starting point. BBR’s live brand rankings and city rankings evaluate what sits behind it, developer credibility, service depth, location quality, pricing context, and investment resilience. For buyers considering a Park Hyatt residence, that independent comparison is the logical next step.

For Buyers

Compare Park Hyatt against Four Seasons, Ritz-Carlton, and Mandarin Oriental

Compare Park Hyatt against Four Seasons, Ritz-Carlton, and Mandarin Oriental by market, developer, and investment profile, and see which Park Hyatt residences justify their premium.

View brand rankings

For Developers

Get evaluated by BBR

BBR helps serious buyers understand which branded projects justify their premium.

Apply for ranking

Sources

Hyatt Newsroom, “Hyatt Evolves Brand Portfolios, Continues Growth Momentum with Record Pipeline,” January 2025. https://newsroom.hyatt.com/2025-01-27-Hyatt-Evolves-Brand-Portfolios,-Continues-Growth-Momentum-with-Record-Pipeline-of-Approximately-138,000-Rooms
Hyatt Newsroom, “Park Hyatt: Luxury Is Personal,” 2025. https://newsroom.hyatt.com/ParkHyattLuxuryIsPersonal
Skift, “Every One of Hyatt’s Brands, Explained,” 2025. https://skift.com/2025/06/22/hyatts-brands-explained/
Hotel Investment Today, “Hyatt’s Residential Growth Story.” https://www.hotelinvestmenttoday.com/Development/Brands/Hyatts-residential-growth-story
Wikipedia, “One57.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One57
6sqft, “Billionaire Michael Dell Revealed as the Secret Buyer of One57’s $100M Penthouse.” https://www.6sqft.com/billionaire-michael-dell-revealed-as-the-secret-buyer-of-one57s-100m-penthouse/
Pacific Century Premium Developments, “Park Hyatt Niseko Hanazono Residences.” https://www.pcpd.com/en/our-portfolio/3/property/park-hyatt-niseko-hanazono-residences-japan-2
Vail Daily, “Park Hyatt Residences Sold Out,” January 2014. https://www.vaildaily.com/news/park-hyatt-residences-sold-out/
Hyatt Newsroom, “Park Hyatt London River Thames Development.” https://newsroom.hyatt.com/park_hyatt_london_river_thames_development
Hotel Designs, “Park Hyatt Brings Its Branded Residences to London,” 2026. https://hoteldesigns.net/industry-news/park-hyatt-brings-its-branded-residences-to-london/
Hospitality Net, “Park Hyatt Los Cabos Hotel and Residences.” https://www.hospitalitynet.org/announcement/41013792.html
Elite Traveler, “Park Hyatt Los Cabos Residences.” https://elitetraveler.com/property/park-hyatt-los-cabos-residences
Park Hyatt Mexico City Residences. https://www.parkhyattmexicocityresidences.com/
BIM Land, “Park Hyatt Phu Quoc Residences.” https://bimland.com/en/parkhyattphuquocresidences
One Mile at a Time, “Park Hyatt Los Angeles, Oceanwide Plaza Update.” https://onemileatatime.com/news/park-hyatt-los-angeles/
Savills, “Branded Residences Annual Report 2025/2026.” https://pdf.savills.com/documents/Savills-Branded-Residences-Annual-Report-2025-2026.pdf
Branded Resi, “Branded Residences Pricing and Service Charge Analysis.” https://brandedresi.com/branded-residences-pricing/
Knight Frank, “The Global Branded Residence Survey 2025.” https://www.knightfrank.co.uk/research/article/2025/9/the-global-branded-residence-survey-2025